| Eligible Undergrads | Undergrad Ballots | Eligible Grads | Grad Ballots | Total Eligible | Total Ballots | |
| 9,149 | 3,603 | 952 | 138 | 10,101 | 3,741 |
| Undergraduate Turnout | Graduate Turnout | Combined Turnout | |
| 39.38% | 14.50% | 37.04% |
Note: Abstain votes are not shown. When reading results, note that the intersection of "total" and "percent" represents the turnout for that measure, officer election, or opinion poll. In order for a measure to pass, 66.6% of voters must vote yes on the measure.
| Yes | No | Total | ||
| Measure A -- THEATER ARTS PRODUCTIONS | FAILED | |||
| Votes | 1,822 | 1,573 | 3,395 | |
| Percent | 53.67% | 46.33% | 37.11% | |
| Measure B -- EAST-WEST PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES | FAILED | |||
| Votes | 1,195 | 2,306 | 3,501 | |
| Percent | 34.13% | 65.87% | 34.66% | |
| Measure C -- UCSC CAMPUS RETENTION PROGRAM | FAILED | |||
| Votes | 1,782 | 1,642 | 3,424 | |
| Percent | 52.04% | 47.96% | 37.42% | |
| Measure D -- FREE AND ANONYMOUS HIV TESTING | PASSED | |||
| Votes | 3,136 | 499 | 3,635 | |
| Percent | 86.27% | 13.73% | 35.99% | |
| Measure E -- INDOOR ROCK CLIMBING FACILITY | FAILED | |||
| Votes | 582 | 2,836 | 3,418 | |
| Percent | 17.03% | 82.97% | 37.36% | |
| Measure F -- IMPROVED CAMPUS TRANSPORTATION | FAILED | |||
| Votes | 889 | 2,577 | 3,466 | |
| Percent | 25.65% | 74.35% | 34.31% | |
| Measure H -- COLLEGE STUDENT GOVERNMENT FEE | FAILED | |||
| Votes | 581 | 2,632 | 3,213 | |
| Percent | 18.08% | 81.92% | 35.12% | |
| Option 1 | Option 2 | Option 3 | No | Total | ||
| Measure G -- OPERS ACTIVITIES FEE - Failed | ||||||
| Votes | 528 | 509 | 450 | 1,884 | 3,371 | |
| Percent | 15.66% | 15.10% | 13.35% | 55.89% | 36.85% | |
| Cumulative Votes | 1,487 | 959 | 450 | 1,884 | 3,371 | |
| Cumulative Percent | 44.11% | 28.45% | 13.35% | 55.89% | 36.85% | |
| SUA CHAIR | |
| Candidate | Total |
| Maria Catalina | 720 |
| Dylan Smith | 881 |
| Kirti Srivastava | 957 |
| UCSA REPRESENTATIVE | |
| Candidate | Total |
| Kenneth S. Burch | 1,424 |
| Christopher J. Le Mon | 865 |
| CAMPUS OFFICE DIRECTOR | |
| Candidate | Total |
| Eric Gonzalez | 2,046 |
| LOBBY CORPS DIRECTOR | |
| Candidate | Total |
| Carolyn Boyd | 655 |
| Daniel Lazo | 980 |
| Patrick McHugh | 522 |
| Agree | Disagree | Total | ||
1. A Graduate College with a residential component is important for the future of graduate education at UCSC. |
||||
| Votes | 69 | 60 | 129 | |
| Percent | 53.49% | 46.51% | 13.55% | |
2. A Graduate College with a residential component would significantly impact your graduate career at UCSC. |
||||
| Votes | 49 | 78 | 127 | |
| Percent | 38.58% | 61.42% | 13.34% | |
3. Graduate student housing at the Graduate College should be primarily apartment style housing rather than dorm style housing. |
||||
| Votes | 120 | 7 | 127 | |
| Percent | 94.49% | 5.51% | 13.34% | |
4. One of the factors I considered strongly in my consideration of UCSC for graduate study was the type of intellectual atmosphere and academic culture the community provided. |
||||
| Votes | 95 | 33 | 128 | |
| Percent | 74.22% | 25.78% | 13.45% | |
5. The current lack of a central facility or community center for graduate students is a significant obstacle to the development of a lively graduate student intellectual community. |
||||
| Votes | 86 | 41 | 127 | |
| Percent | 67.72% | 32.28% | 13.34% | |
6. A facility which provided living space for some graduate students, TA offices, computer labs and seminar rooms - in close proximity to the Graduate Dean's and other administrative offices - would be a definite improvement. |
||||
| Votes | 86 | 40 | 126 | |
| Percent | 68.25% | 31.75% | 13.24% | |
7. Finding accessible, economically priced housing is a definite concern for graduate students. |
||||
| Votes | 131 | 0 | 131 | |
| Percent | 100.00% | 0.00% | 13.76% | |
8. On campus graduate housing should be separate from undergraduate housing. |
||||
| Votes | 115 | 12 | 127 | |
| Percent | 90.55% | 9.45% | 13.34% | |
9. Graduate housing should include facilities for graduate families and single graduate students. |
||||
| Votes | 104 | 23 | 127 | |
| Percent | 81.89% | 18.11% | 13.34% | |
10. Graduate family housing might be mixed with family housing for undergraduates. |
||||
| Votes | 90 | 37 | 127 | |
| Percent | 70.87% | 29.13% | 13.34% | |
11. Close proximity to child care facilities would be a significant advantage for graduate family housing. |
||||
| Votes | 112 | 12 | 124 | |
| Percent | 90.32% | 9.68% | 13.03% | |
12. A Graduate College which includes housing, office space for graduate students, classroom and meeting space would be a definite asset at UCSC. |
||||
| Votes | 91 | 32 | 123 | |
| Percent | 73.98% | 26.02% | 12.92% | |
13. An coffee shop would be an attraction at the Graduate College. |
||||
| Votes | 107 | 18 | 125 | |
| Percent | 85.60% | 14.40% | 13.13% | |
14. A mini-mart type of store would be an important component of residential life at a Graduate College. |
||||
| Votes | 68 | 53 | 121 | |
| Percent | 56.20% | 43.80% | 12.71% | |
15. A Graduate College would facilitate cross-disciplinary professional and non-professional interactions between graduate students. |
||||
| Votes | 106 | 18 | 124 | |
| Percent | 85.48% | 14.52% | 13.03% | |
16. A Graduate College should coordinate campus programs for professional and non-professional graduate student development. |
||||
| Votes | 100 | 24 | 124 | |
| Percent | 80.65% | 19.35% | 13.03% | |
17. Adequate parking is an important issue for a Graduate College. |
||||
| Votes | 93 | 33 | 126 | |
| Percent | 73.81% | 26.19% | 13.24% | |
| Do you currently own a campus parking permit? | ||||
| Yes | No | Total | ||
| Votes | 1,072 | 2,358 | 3,430 | |
| Percent | 31.25% | 68.75% | 37.49% | |
| In order to relieve the parking and transportation problems on campus, what should be UCSC's top priority? | |||||||
| Option 1 | Option 2 | Option 3 | All | None | Total | ||
| Votes | 720 | 661 | 447 | 699 | 248 | 2,775 | |
| Percent | 25.95% | 23.82% | 16.11% | 25.19% | 8.94% | 30.33% | |
| UCSC is currently planning to build a 6-story (Faculty, Staff and Grad permits only) parking structure on Science Hill and EVERYONE'S parkings fees will be increased in order to cover the cost. Should UCSC build this parking structure? | ||||
| Yes | No | Total | ||
| Votes | 367 | 2,941 | 3,308 | |
| Percent | 11.09% | 88.91% | 36.16% | |
| UCSC might move to a year-round system where the summer quarter was just like any other quarter, but you could now choose which (if any) quarter to take off. Which option would you choose? | ||||||||
| Summer | Fall | Winter | Spring | None | Same | Total | ||
| Votes | 927 | 49 | 267 | 82 | 1,937 | 90 | 3,352 | |
| Percent | 27.66% | 1.46% | 7.97% | 2.45% | 57.79% | 2.68% | 36.64% | |