New Graduate and Undergraduate Compulsory Fee: $3.50/quarter ($10.50/year).
Fee begins Fall Quarter 1999 and ends when long-term loan is paid in full, estimated to be 2028-29.
This question was approved for placement on the undergraduate ballot by resolution of the Student Union Assembly (SUA), and on the graduate student ballot by resolution of the Graduate Student Association (GSA).
If approved, this fee would generate approximately $111,646 in 1999-2000.
MEASURE B QUESTION
"Does the student body approve a quarterly fee of $3.50/per quarter, effective Fall 1999, for the construction of two pedestrian bridges between the East Field House and the Student Center to facilitate east-west pedestrian traffic?"
Choose...
Yes
No
MEASURE B BALLOT STATEMENT
This fee will be used to pay for the construction of two new pedestrian bridges. Assuming a satisfactory environmental review, these bridges would be completed by Summer 2001, and will span the two canyons between the Student Center and the East Field House. These new bridges will significantly improve student pedestrian and bicycle access between the eastside of campus (i.e., the vicinity of the East Field House and the East Remote parking lot), the central campus core (McHenry Library, the Student Center, and the Performing Arts and Music facilities), and the West Colleges. These two new pedestrian bridges will promote the use and convenience of the East Remote parking lot, substantially increase foot-traffic access to the Student Center and the East Fieldhouse, and promote pollution-free cross-campus circulation.
Total fees assessed to students will not exceed total design, construction, financing and maintenance costs of the project. Total project cost is estimated to be $1,442,000 ($1,214,000 from long-term loan and $228,000 from fees collected during design and construction). If for some reason this project is unable to go forward, this fee will be discontinued immediately. If, due to increased enrollments, fees collected exceed the actual amount needed for the project, any excess funds will be allocated to other student-fee supported programs as recommended by the Student Fee Advisory Committee.
Long-term Loan Amount: $1,214,000
Interest Rate: 6.5%
Loan Duration: 27 years
Regental Debt Service Guarantee: 25%
PRO/CON Statements for Measure B
Pro:
Imagine getting off a bus at the East Field House and walking a few minutes to the central campus core, 5 minutes to Porter, Oakes and College Eight. A bridge would provide convenient and quick access for cross campus pedestrians. A pedestrian bridge between the East Field and the Student Center would dramatically change the visibility and accessibility of central campus core programs like the Student Center, Music Center, Performing Arts and Visual Arts.
We envision the following benefits:
Pollution free cross-campus commuting;
Convenient use of East Remote parking;
Faster access from Porter, Oakes, Eight to east campus, and vise versa;
Increased access to the Student Center (Bike Co-Op, Junxion, Press Center, student organizations, etc.) and central campus core;
Submitted by: Yes on Measure B Committee: Day Frostenson - Stevenson, Ben Faber - Kresge, Michael Park - Kresge, David Spiciarich. - Crown
Con:
Should students have to pay for a bridge that could accommodate pedestrian transit on campus? The University's infrastructure is the responsibility of the State, not the students! What good is a bridge if no one can afford to walk across it? The state can afford this and the students cannot. Do not make us pay for it, VOTE NO ON MEASURE B.
Submitted by: Kenny Burch - Crown College
MEASURE D FREE AND ANONYMOUS HIV TESTING
New Graduate and Undergraduate Compulsory Fee: $0.75/quarter ($2.25/year).
Fee begins Fall Quarter 1999, permanent fee (no ending date).
This fee was approved for placement on the undergraduate ballot by petition, and on the graduate student ballot by resolution of the Graduate Student Association (GSA).
If approved, this fee would generate approximately $23,924 in 1999-2000.
MEASURE D QUESTION
Shall UCSC students (graduate and undergraduate) establish a $0.75/per quarter fee, effective Fall 1999, to provide free and anonymous testing through the HIV Peer Test Counseling Program?
Yes
No
MEASURE D BALLOT STATEMENT
This $2.25 fee would establish an alternative to the $25 Confidential Testing offered at Student Health Services and, for the first time, HIV Peer Test Counselors would be able to augment testing at Health Services with special outreach testing at colleges and campus events. We expect this would nearly double the number of HIV tests provided each year. Finally, this fee would cover the cost of student supervision for, and administration of, the program.
Health Center clinicians will continue to offer confidential HIV tests (for a fee) to those who need it for travel abroad, etc.
All anonymous tests will utilize equally effective oral testing methods instead of blood draws.
PRO/CON Statements for Measure D
Pro:
Currently, all HIV tests at UCSC are confidential and cost $20-$25. This mandatory fee and the lack of anonymity are barriers that drive students off campus for testing. Both barriers could be eliminated by Measure D. A painless and reliable oral testing method (Orasure), will allow HIV Peer Test Counselors to conduct tests in non-clinical settings. Therefore, outreach testing could take place across campus. This greater accessibility would most likely increase the demand for testing. The $0.75 per quarter fee would pay for approximately 750 tests per year (double the number currently done) and pay for a student coordinator to ensure that the new service maintains the high quality of the current test program. By providing free and anonymous testing on campus, Measure D would reduce student traffic at off-campus test sites, thereby freeing up these services for non-students at risk in the greater Santa Cruz community. This measure is strongly supported by both SUA and GSA
Submitted by: Ayesha Cammaerts - College Eight A representative of the HIV Peer Test Counselors
Con:
This measure will charge all students to pay for HIV testing, yet there will not be enough testing for all the students of UCSC. You might end up paying for this fee and still not be able to get a needed HIV test. Vote NO on D.
Submitted by: Ben Faber - Kresge College
MEASURE F IMPROVED CAMPUS TRANSPORTATION
Graduate and Undergraduate Compulsory Transportation Fee Increase: $5/quarter ($15/year) in 1999-2000; an additional $5/quarter ($15/year) increase in 2000-2001; and an additional $5/quarter ($15/year) increase in 2001-2002.
1999-2000 existing Transportation Fee is $59/quarter ($177/year).
Fee Increase begins Fall Quarter 1999, permanent fee (no ending date).
This question was approved for placement on the undergraduate ballot by resolution of the Student Union Assembly (SUA), and on the graduate student ballot by a proposal of the Dean of Graduate Studies.
If approved, this fee increase would generate approximately $159,495 in 1999-2000; $299,880 in 2000-01; and $464,814 in 2001-02.
MEASURE F QUESTION
Does the student body approve an incremental fee increase of $5/quarter ($15/year) effective Fall 1999, an additional $5/quarter ($15/year) effective Fall 2000, and an additional $5/quarter ($15/year) effective Fall 2001 and thereafter to fund expansion of the Campus Transit vehicle fleet?
Yes
No
MEASURE F BALLOT STATEMENT
In the Spring 1995 student election, the UCSC student body approved (with a 94% majority and a 42% turnout) an incremental increase in the Transportation Fee currently in place. This fee "tops out" at $59/quarter ($177/year) in Fall 1999. While revenues generated by the existing fee have been adequate to fund increased SCMTD services and acquisition of 14 new shuttle buses for TAPS' Campus Transit fleet, the demand for intracampus transit services has grown more rapidly than anticipated.
In order to accommodate additional ridership and sustain current hours of Day and Night Shuttle service, Transportation & Parking Services (TAPS) proposes an incremental increase of $5/quarter ($15/year) for the next three years, with the first increase commencing in Fall 1999. These funds will be used to:
Acquire 12 additional Shuttle vehicles, including three large-capacity buses;
Maintain the extended Night Shuttle service hours implemented in Winter 1999;
Improve several transit pullouts, including one at Colleges 9/10;
Provide expanded operation of the TAPS Paratransit Van Service;
Maintain existing Premium Transit services, such as the Westside Shopper Shuttle, the Late Night Downtown Shuttle, and the BART Connector service.
If this fee increase is approved, the new Campus Transportation Fee would be $192/year in 1999-2000; $207/year in 2000-01; and $222/year in 2001-02 and thereafter.
PRO/CON Statements for Measure F
Pro:
Ridership of the Campus Transit system-from the Day and Night Shuttle to the BART Connector-has increased dramatically since 1995, when the current Student Transit Fee was overwhelmingly approved by the UCSC student body. While those fees have helped fund the acquisition of several new, larger vehicles and afforded expanded service, demand for transit services has exceeded expectations.
In order to accommodate additional ridership, the Campus Transit system needs additional large-capacity buses. While expanding the capacity of the system, these new vehicles will replace the oldest shuttles now in operation, thereby providing greater capacity with more reliable vehicles.
If Measure F fails, the campus will experience increasingly crowded shuttles, more frequent passbys by full buses, and a reduction in service hours as aging equipment becomes less reliable.
Your "YES" vote for Measure F helps assure that Campus Transit services remain reliable, convenient and available to the campus community.
Submitted by: Larry Pageler, Transportation Analyst, Transportation and Parking Services
Con:
Measure F will produce a total increase of $45 per year just to supply you with what you already have. NONE OF THIS MONEY GOES TO INCREASING BUS SERVICE! The $286,200 that this fee generates will all go to simply maintaining the Shuttle Service that you already pay $177 per year for!. What we truly need are better alternatives to get us to and from campus. If this measure passes our money will be wasted on day services we do not want or need.
Submitted by: Kenny Burch - Crown College
Opinion Polls
A Graduate College with a residential component is important for the future of graduate education at UCSC.
Agree/Disagree
A Graduate College with a residential component would significantly impact your graduate career at UCSC.
Agree/Disagree
Graduate student housing at the Graduate College should be primarily apartment style housing rather than dorm style housing.
Agree/Disagree
One of the factors I considered strongly in my consideration of UCSC for graduate study was the type of intellectual atmosphere and academic culture the community provided.
Agree/Disagree
The current lack of a central facility or community center for graduate students is a significant obstacle to the development of a lively graduate student intellectual community.
Agree/Disagree
A facility which provided living space for some graduate students, TA offices, computer labs and seminar rooms - in close proximity to the Graduate Dean's and other administrative offices - would be a definite improvement.
Agree/Disagree
Finding accessible, economically priced housing is a definite concern for graduate students.
Agree/Disagree
On campus graduate housing should be separate from undergraduate housing.
Agree/Disagree
Graduate housing should include facilities for graduate families and single graduate students.
Agree/Disagree
Graduate family housing might be mixed with family housing for undergraduates.
Agree/Disagree
Close proximity to child care facilities would be a significant advantage for graduate family housing.
Agree/Disagree
A Graduate College which includes housing, office space for graduate students, classroom and meeting space would be a definite asset at UCSC.
Agree/Disagree
An coffee shop would be an attraction at the Graduate College.
Agree/Disagree
A mini-mart type of store would be an important component of residential life at a Graduate College.
Agree/Disagree
A Graduate College would facilitate cross-disciplinary professional and non-professional interactions between graduate students.
Agree/Disagree
A Graduate College should coordinate campus programs for professional and non-professional graduate student development.
Agree/Disagree
Adequate parking is an important issue for a Graduate College.